PUBLIC PROSECUTOR DROPS ALL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Chief Justice Sir Gibbs Salika has been cleared of 50 misconduct allegations after the Office of the Public Prosecutor declared there was insufficient evidence to refer him to a Leadership Tribunal.

Acting Public Prosecutor Helen Roalakona announced the decision at a press conference this afternoon, bringing an end to months of scrutiny following a referral by the Ombudsman Commission.

Ms Roalakona said investigators closely examined the allegations, including claims relating to money received by the Chief Justice, but found the funds were derived from legitimate income sources that had already been declared in his annual statements.

She said the evidence presented by the Ombudsman Commission did not meet the threshold required for a tribunal referral.

The decision means Sir Gibbs will not face further leadership proceedings over the allegations.

The Office of the Public Prosecutor said its assessment was based strictly on the evidence available and the requirements of the law.

Loading

Comments

One response to “PUBLIC PROSECUTOR DROPS ALL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE CHIEF JUSTICE”

  1. Charles Jasari Avatar
    Charles Jasari

    The decision by the Public Prosecutor to drop all charges against the Chief Justice (CJ) shows very clearly that the Chief Ombudsman is incompetent!!
    He either did his job unprofessionally which resulted in the case being dropped by Public Prosecutor OR that he intentionally put in fabricated information to turnish the name and character of the CJ with the view to replacing him with someone else for a desired end.
    When the Public Prosecutor announced receiving the referral, I made a comment praising the OC’s work and called for thorough investigation by the Public Prosecutor as our country was Grey Listed for money Laundering among other anomalies which seemed as me inferring that the report by the OC against the CJ was true. I did not infer guilt on the part of the CJ as my comments was literal as I wrote. If the CJ felt offended in anyway, I apologise to him.
    I am even concerned that such baseless allegations could be made by a Constitutional Office against someone holding another Constitutional Office!!
    When that happens, I think the government of the day, that has the appointing authority must step in and make appropriate decisions and changes to the Office of the OC to uphold its integrity and professionalism.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from NewsLink PNG

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading